<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Accidental, The Essential, and Corporate Earnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/40/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/40</link>
	<description>software architecture &#38; engineering, code hints, sometimes philosophy, photography, life, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:51:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason McDonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/40/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/40#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I believe it was in &quot;No Silver Bullet, Refired&quot; that Brooks noted that he had a large audience outside of the software industry as well. His theory was that this was because of the exact reasons you have just stated - that the accidental and the incidental were facets of life in general instead of ones of just software. The basic premise that I take away, and you support here, is that things that are lucrative, rewarding, and generally worthwhile are rarely going to be easy and there will almost never be a silver bullet. If there were then everyone would be doing it.

Also, as for the dynamic code IDEs, IntelliJ 7 supports both Ruby on Rails and Grails and seems to do a pretty good job of it. On top of this IntelliJ 7 is MUCH faster than IntelliJ 6.

Jason McDonald
www.mcdonaldland.info
https://www.cafepress.com/codergear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was in &#8220;No Silver Bullet, Refired&#8221; that Brooks noted that he had a large audience outside of the software industry as well. His theory was that this was because of the exact reasons you have just stated &#8211; that the accidental and the incidental were facets of life in general instead of ones of just software. The basic premise that I take away, and you support here, is that things that are lucrative, rewarding, and generally worthwhile are rarely going to be easy and there will almost never be a silver bullet. If there were then everyone would be doing it.</p>
<p>Also, as for the dynamic code IDEs, IntelliJ 7 supports both Ruby on Rails and Grails and seems to do a pretty good job of it. On top of this IntelliJ 7 is MUCH faster than IntelliJ 6.</p>
<p>Jason McDonald<br />
<a href="http://www.mcdonaldland.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcdonaldland.info</a><br />
<a href="https://www.cafepress.com/codergear" rel="nofollow">https://www.cafepress.com/codergear</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
