<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech predictions for 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18</link>
	<description>software architecture &#38; engineering, code hints, sometimes philosophy, photography, life, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:50:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Terracotta Server as a Message Bus</title>
		<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Terracotta Server as a Message Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] a few weeks ago I made two predictions for 2008, but both centered around Terracotta. Since that time, I&#8217;ve gone deeper into the server and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few weeks ago I made two predictions for 2008, but both centered around Terracotta. Since that time, I&#8217;ve gone deeper into the server and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I share your enthusiasm for Terracotta.  It&#039;s just so damn... &#039;elegant&#039;.  I hate using that word for tech stuff but in this case it&#039;s justified.  It&#039;s just brilliant.  Terracotta is clearly the way of the future for distributing procedural code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your enthusiasm for Terracotta.  It&#8217;s just so damn&#8230; &#8216;elegant&#8217;.  I hate using that word for tech stuff but in this case it&#8217;s justified.  It&#8217;s just brilliant.  Terracotta is clearly the way of the future for distributing procedural code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orion Letizi</title>
		<link>http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Orion Letizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/18#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Not surprisingly, I agree with you on all points.  I&#039;m really glad you pointed out the helpful error message.  It did, in fact, take a lot of work to get those to be helpful, but it&#039;s absolutely critical to ease of use.  Software just isn&#039;t interesting if it&#039;s not easy to use.  I&#039;d rather write it myself if I can&#039;t figure out how to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprisingly, I agree with you on all points.  I&#8217;m really glad you pointed out the helpful error message.  It did, in fact, take a lot of work to get those to be helpful, but it&#8217;s absolutely critical to ease of use.  Software just isn&#8217;t interesting if it&#8217;s not easy to use.  I&#8217;d rather write it myself if I can&#8217;t figure out how to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
