http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/129 software architecture & engineering, code hints, sometimes philosophy, photography, life, etc. Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:26:50 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/129/comment-page-1#comment-1025 Jim Sun, 10 May 2009 01:59:24 +0000 http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/129#comment-1025 Nothing better than order of magnitude performance gain. Note also that because contains on a vector is O(n), and you were checking each object, your page was O(n^2), which is not good. Nothing better than order of magnitude performance gain. Note also that because contains on a vector is O(n), and you were checking each object, your page was O(n^2), which is not good.

]]> http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/129/comment-page-1#comment-1024 Tony Piazza Sun, 10 May 2009 00:44:43 +0000 http://blog.markturansky.com/archives/129#comment-1024 Nice post. It's a nice reminder of why constant refactoring is worth the effort. I've seen plenty of legacy Java code that could be improved by refactoring some uses of Vector with one of the 1.4+ unsynchronized Collection classes. Nice post. It’s a nice reminder of why constant refactoring is worth the effort. I’ve seen plenty of legacy Java code that could be improved by refactoring some uses of Vector with one of the 1.4+ unsynchronized Collection classes.

]]>